
My sentiments on SMART cities got a kind of boost when the
industry representatives on the dais asked if the foot soldiers of the
government's machinery could accurately define what a SMART City meant? He felt that for
many it meant just four words "Free WiFi for all". Going by ground
reality, India at present lacks the infrastructure and resources including
manpower for creating such cities given the time-cost delays in almost all government
led projects. Some 109,000 crores and an average of 12 years on just 700 of the
key works being undertaken by the public sector.
The one attempt of building a SMART city
called GIFT in Gujarat has not been a runaway success either. Conceived in
2006-7; there are 2 towers that have just been completed in 2014 now serving as
a hope that something grand will emerge here - hopefully before 2019. It's not
a fatalistic thought but one where all the key players be it private or public
entities need to "communicate" with each other on how each of these
100 goals will be achieved in the set time and cost; and how each of them will
help in increasing India's GDP and SGP ranking on a global scale.
The Govt. view came from a very intelligent
IAS officer who was candid enough to publicly state that accountability in
terms of time and money was not a priority within the administrative machinery
for a number of reasons; prime being changing goal posts caused by frequent
policy and leadership shifts at all levels. He felt that the private sector
was always quick to blame the authorities for all the woes; yet the practise of
evolving a "juice the economics" has originated on that side of the
divide. If the entire project process was conceived upon the "advance
ruling" concept where the end goal was frozen the entire creation and
economic use process would become more disciplined than it is now on all
delivery parameters including transparency. Obviously; for him agility was not
a virtue / luxury that the Govt. could afford, given its administrative size
and scale. He may be right from his point of view; but in my mind that's really not the answer. In fact it's far from it as in today's world change is the only constant. There are too many conflicting policies and decision makers around which I call the real culprits. Is their existence deliberate? I think I just asked a rhetorical question. Just to state simple example; the City of Mumbai is governed by regulations enforced by its Municipal Corporation (BMC); its development authority (MMRDA) and the State Government - and many a times each one has a contradictory policy on the same subject.
Obviously then; a SMART City would require SMART infrastructure to be put in place where the internet and technology are mere enablers. Adopting technology without a the larger purpose of improving the Quality of Life is a sheer waste. From a return on investment perspective; the best place to introduce SMARTness is where there is pain festering from ill planned urban planning - and India, no better place to start than the 8 major cities. Yes there is an argument in favour of decongesting the existing metros by creating new and worthy alternatives; but in reality, the incentive of a SMART tag will not be sufficient for a person to cut the urban umbilical of self and family. Our PM should visit the ghost town cities of China to get a better sense of how fast his Utopian dream could turn Dystopian. Moreover, newer cities need to be planned on a change-predictive (Agile) and modular basis to allow for population and socio-economic growth. They have to follow the DIRT (Do It Right Today) principles of urban planning. It is the existing cities that need to become more sustainable, environmentally friendly, and tech efficient to cut down on wastage of precious time and limited resources while improving the happiness quotient of its citizens. Key areas that can improve using SMART agile methodologies include; Administrative and Security Management, Parking, Water Management, Street Lighting, Waste Management, Public Transport, Open Spaces management. All of these have a direct bearing on improving the City's own economic sustainability. (Incidentally; Mumbai's draft Development plan proposed to take it into 2034 hardly addresses any of these issues).
Finally, "Agility" for me is a character and not a process; one that has to be self injected into our work DNA irrespective of what segment we work in. If that is not possible; I am sorry, we shall then be left "smarting" and not "SMART".
Views in press post this blog:
![]() |
http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/index.aspx?eid=31804&dt=20150828 |
98 cities named for `smart city' makeover, no Kolkata & B'luru
New Delhi
TIMES NEWS NETWORK
|
The Centre on Thursday announced the names of 98 urban centres and cities nominated by the state governments for the “Smart City“ scheme. Two dozen state capitals, 24 economic and business hubs and 18 urban areas of cultural and tourism importance are on the list.Announcing the nominations, urban development minister M Venkaiah Naidu said it was a good signal that 65 small and medium towns and cities have made it to the list of smart city aspirants. Several big cities including state capitals such as Kolkata, Bengaluru, Patna, Thiruvananthapuram and Shimla have failed to make the cut.
The identified 98 urban areas, which fall under municipal jurisdictions, will cover about 13 crore people accounting for over 35% of the country's total urban population.
The identified 98 urban areas, which fall under municipal jurisdictions, will cover about 13 crore people accounting for over 35% of the country's total urban population.